Skip to content
DealMap Intel
Trust by design

Every fact carries its receipts.

The evidence engine is the core of DealMap Intel. It treats each claim about a property — an owner, a square footage, a flood status — as a piece of evidence with a source, a confidence level, and an expiry, so your team always knows how much to trust what it sees.

Anatomy of a claim

Provenance, confidence, and expiry — on everything.

A number without a source is a rumor. DealMap Intel attaches the context that makes a fact defensible.

Provenance

Where the claim came from — which source, which record, and when it was captured.

Confidence

How strongly the evidence supports the claim, so weak signals never masquerade as facts.

Expiry

When the claim should be treated as stale and re-verified rather than trusted blindly.
States, not guesses

Three honest states for any field.

Verified

Supported by current, sufficiently confident evidence.

In conflict / expiring

Sources disagree, or the claim is aging toward its expiry.

Unknown

Shown plainly as unknown — never fabricated to look complete.

Why it matters

Bad data is more expensive than no data.

Acting on a fabricated owner or a stale square footage costs real time and credibility. By grading evidence and gating what reaches the queue, DealMap Intel keeps your team's attention on opportunities the data can actually support.

Sufficiency gating

An opportunity is only promoted to the analyst queue when its evidence is sufficient — enough verified, current, and confident claims to justify a human's time. Thin or contradictory records stay out of the way until they earn their place.

FAQ

Common questions

The conflict is surfaced with both sources and their confidence levels. DealMap Intel does not silently overwrite one value with another; a human sees the disagreement.

Put evidence at the center of sourcing.